Spurs Blogsville

Have Your Say: The Mourinho Debate, Burnley Proves How Spurs Should Approach Games

|

If we look at the sheer number of goal attempts against Tottenham Hotspur in the last two matches (Norwich City and Burnley) and knowing that it was two goalkeeper errors that saw us concede just two goals – then our defenders have defended quite well, given the onslaught they faced in those games.

Writer: Hot Tottingham

I put the blame firmly on Jose Mourinho’s tactics for why we have had to face such large numbers of goal attempts against us. And when we see that it was a total of 21 goal attempts for Burnley on Saturday and knowing that most were in the 1st half, what does that tell us about JM’s overly defensive set-up yesterday, in that 1st half, in particular? It tells us that it’s not working. This is more than obvious.

Some suggest that Spurs risk being trounced on a regular basis because of our poor defence, and so this is good reason for Jose’s defensive, back-to-the-wall tactics. Well, if we had played any top club yesterday, with top strikers, I fear that we would have been thrashed out of sight by half-time. And it would’ve been mainly down to our defensive and completely negative tactics that serve to keep us on the back foot, with no outlet and seemingly, no midfield, to protect our defence or link the defence to our attackers. We were so negative. Poor. Really bad! Bad tactics, not necessarily, bad defenders.

Are Jose's Tactics Holding Us Back?

Our Strengths Suit A Front Foot Approach

He Doesn't Have A Choice With Our Injuries

It happens whomever we play in defence. Or in whatever formation. In the 2nd half, when we went on the front foot yesterday, it all changed. We looked like a proper cohesive team again. A team that had fight and spirit. An attacking team that came close to winning after putting the opposition on the back foot. In other words, we were much less defensive and more positive and forward thinking. We attacked! And Burnley had to resort to their own (dirty) defensive tactics in order to keep us out. They had to continually chop us down to stop us…and our players didn’t look anywhere near as leggy. They found some energy in the 2nd half. Like I will insist, a positive, and more attacking Spurs team will find their energy, playing football on the front-foot, and they will win more matches.

Hey, they still didn’t win yesterday. But after that incredibly poor 1st half showing, a draw felt so much like a win to me that I’m almost over the moon……how sad and bad is that?

I can’t say that I’m looking forward to RB Leipzig on Tuesday, and that is sad – because I can’t remember the last time I felt like that watching Spurs week in, week out…

Here’s hoping!

1 of 10

German striker Jurgen Klinsmann spent two years at White Hart Lane in separate spells, but how many league goals did he contribute?

Previous Article:

3 Shots, 4 Key Passes & Second Most Touches – 23 y/o Gives Spurs Fans Something To Cheer On Another Poor Night

Share this article

0 comments

  • Hot Tottingham says:

    I agree! 😉

    Thank you Danny for recognising my rant and giving it a thread. Even though I’m somewhat embarrassed to see it separated from the original thread.

    Cheers!

    At the end of the day, I just wanna see some half-decent football being played. We do have the players!

    I know that it’s not at all easy for Jose. So, we can only hope for better and that he can somehow manage to eventually work some magic on our beloved Spurs.

    I’ve not given up on him or the team, just yet.

    • Danny Winter says:

      No probs HT – I’ve probably missed a few comments lately that I think work as an article and deserves a wider audience, but when I do spot them I’ll use them (makes my life easier! lol). Difficult isn’t it as whatever the cause of this was in 2019 – JM didn’t start it – but equally he seems lost on how to get us back to our best – even more than allowing for the fatigue/injury aspect.

      Then again, this is why he’s paid the big bucks – it’s his problem, fans just suffer lol

Comments are closed.