Following news that Spurs youngster Jack Clarke was reduced to a spot on Queens Park Rangers’ bench again on Wednesday night against Wigan Athletic, many Lilywhites have flocked in discussion of the ‘wasted‘ £4.86 million-valued ace – hinting our purchase was ‘ridiculous‘.
Clarke, who signed for Tottenham in the summer of 2019, immediately being loaned back to the Championship for the 2019/2020 campaign, put pen-to-paper on a £10 million deal – but he has struggled to replicate his 2018/2019 form which prompted us to go for the Englishman.
Should Spurs have signed Jack Clarke?
Yes, will come good
No, total waste of money
Showing early promise for Leeds United, scoring two goals and assisting two others for Marcelo Bielsa’s side last season, Spurs opted to purchase the 19-year-old – but he has since gone on to struggle for game time in England’s second tier.
Making just six substitute appearances combined for both Leeds and QPR, plenty of supporters are now in full discussion over chairman Daniel Levy’s decision to sign the player.
Find all over their best comments down below.
Another young talent being wasted. He wouldn’t get a game with us either.
— Jamie Robinson (@2611JamieRob) July 8, 2020
Ridiculous signing honestly
— Alex (@_10kanee) July 8, 2020
Awful loan.
— ENICOUT (@axxxxop) July 8, 2020
And we missed out on Dybala for the sake of £14.5m? Wow
— Richie (@Richie88571618) July 8, 2020
Just give em Luke Amos and Clarke for Eze, those two aren’t worth it to keep
— Cereal4Real🌐 (@nikolaj0302) July 8, 2020
Dybala image rights right there 😂
— #COYS (@COYS_Mindset) July 8, 2020
What a signing though 😳
— Doron (@Doron1984) July 8, 2020
Jack Clarke doesn’t sound as if he’ll ever be as good as Utd’s youngster Daniel James, Greenwood etc etc. Who recommended him, another Bostock
— hugh johnson (@HughNTJohnson) July 8, 2020